Version: 2008
mcall.com

>> Return to mcall.com Wireless & Networking page

August 24, 2009 4:59 PM PDT

Wikipedia to add editing safeguard for the living

by Michelle Meyers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments

Wikipedia will soon be adding a feature to its English-language site that assigns an experienced editor to sign off on any changes to articles on living people, according to Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that runs the user-written online encyclopedia.

Confirming a story reported Monday by The New York Times, Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh said the "flagged revisions" feature is already active on the German site, but needs some fleshing out before it goes live to the public on the English site.

The plan is to deploy the feature on a test wiki soon so the Wikipedia community can play around with before it goes public. The test wiki is expected to go live soon, but no specific time frame has been established, Walsh said.

The feature was debated earlier this year in the aftermath of a false entry that was posted by a user, saying Sens. Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd had died after an inaugural luncheon in January.

It's intended to provide some additional "protection" and to "prevent vandals" from messing with living-person articles, Walsh said. Until approved by the volunteer editor, any changes to such articles will sit invisible to the public on Wikipedia's servers.

This is a big job, Walsh added, and ultimately the community will decide whether to make it a permanent feature. It's bound to be controversial for those who passionately believe in the site's motto as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit."

Staff writer Daniel Terdiman contributed to this story

Michelle Meyers is an associate editor who tracks online happenings in media, entertainment, and politics. E-mail Michelle.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Twins learn of teen brother's death on Facebook
University worker accused of extorting student file sharers
1080p streaming not coming to Netflix this year
Netflix says ISPs could threaten Web video
Nook back on sale
Bids are in for AOL's sale of ICQ--it's down to 'UN' of 4 buyers
Google working on speech translation for phones
PayPal suspends service in India
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by Orion Blastar August 24, 2009 6:17 PM PDT
This just in Abe Vogoda is still alive. :)

Anyway Wikis are prone to vandalism and often need cleaning up and reverting.

Colleges don't accept Wikipedia links as citations anymore because Wikipedia has become biased in many articles, as well as vandalism can make articles inaccurate or just plain wrong. It is usally a left wing bias like many Internet web sites due to ultra-left-wing activists who take up to spreading propaganda on the web (and even write articles on other web sites like Slashdot or even here at CNet).
Reply to this comment
by thekohser August 24, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
Ms. Meyers, do you do any sort of investigative journalism, or do you just regurgitate the news of other organizations and quote the PR puffery of the spokespeople of your subject matter. I'd like to see something a bit more hard-hitting by CNET. But then again, CNET is the same organization who interviewed Wikimedia director Sue Gardner when Jimmy Wales was caught in the headlights of the Rachel Marsden "sex for edits" scandal, and the inability to counteract the allegations that Wikimedia funds were sought for a Moscow massage parlor visit, and did not challenge Gardner when she said "Jimmy has never done anything wrong."

http://cnettv.cnet.com/wikimedia-foundation-defends-wales/9742-1_53-32449.html

That was some cream-puff journalism there.
by Pishkado August 25, 2009 5:51 AM PDT
Typical ultra-right-wing troll: anyone who doesn't agree with you has to be a "left-wing activist." Has it ever occurred to you that you might be the one who's a bit off?
by pentest August 25, 2009 7:59 AM PDT
Reality has a liberal bias.
by knowles2 August 25, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
The ultra right are just as bad if not worst.
by jakedog030 August 24, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
Wikipedia is one of my favorite websites. I am glad they're finally taking steps to prevent vandals from venting their stupidity.
Reply to this comment
by fifthavenueandfiftyninth August 25, 2009 4:16 AM PDT
Give Jimmy Wales a break with respect to Rachel Marsden. Her rep for entangling and causing profound problems with men is well known and documented - in this case give him the benefit of the doubt. I don't know when guys will figure out - she's trouble - stay away.
Reply to this comment
by thekohser January 26, 2010 9:00 AM PST
Five months later, where is that "flagged revisions" implementation?

Count Michelle Meyers as yet another journalist duped by Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

Tech at the Olympics: 'No room to fail'

Q&A The Olympics relies on thousands of servers and PCs to manage all the athletes and scores. Magnus Alvarsson is the guy who must make sure everything works.

How CoverItLive lost it on iPad day

The live-blogging tool fell apart under the strain of a Steve Jobs keynote. Here's what happened, and what comes next for the company.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right